3 ms·
You’ve misread my comment. I definitely think this policy is a step in the right direction. My reference to python is a response to people claiming that rust
by nindalf 2y ago
You’ve misread my comment.
I definitely think this policy is a step in the right direction.
My reference to python is a response to people claiming that rust will fail because of this trademark policy. If Python didn’t fail because of their similar policy, then Rust won’t either.
- jchw 2y agoI didn't misread your comment: I'm not really concerned with whether or not the policy is considered a step in the right direction or not, just suggesting that it really doesn't matter at all to the success or failure of Rust. Furthermore, Python is a pretty bad example. The Python Software Foundation has had multiple high-profile instances of reasonable outcry. See: DjangoCon Africa, or the banning of Tim Peters. The Python Software Foundation exists because of the tremendous success of Python, not because of the tremendous success of their policies.