4 ms·
> One party would agree to be filmed/paid for sex, back out half way through, and then sue for involuntary pornography and consent. I mean, I understand what y
by nolok 2y ago
> One party would agree to be filmed/paid for sex, back out half way through, and then sue for involuntary pornography and consent.
I mean, I understand what you're saying but you're making it sound like "it's not real rape but more like contractual disagreement".
If someone backs out half way through, they absolutely should be allowed. There might be compensation in their contract etc ... But that's implementation details, the base fact is just because you said "Yes I agree to do X for Y money" doesn't mean you can't quit your job after it starts, and your employer cannot force you to keep working until he's satified with the result. That apply to pretty much any job, but especially to something like porn.
- Onavo 2y ago> your employer cannot force you to keep working until he's satified with the result. That apply to pretty much any job, but especially to something like porn Yes, but there is no equivalent of a clear cut "at will" employment for sex workers, and this needs to change. Legislators refuse to touch this topic with a six foot pole, and that's why it's all in a grey area. Contract law shouldn't come into play here at all, and given the high stakes, it's unfair for producers to be ipso facto accused of sexual assault everytime there's a breach of contract (you can extend this to prostitution too).