3 ms·
Cite your sources. Just because something feels true doesn't make it so.
by sirsinsalot 2y ago
Cite your sources.
Just because something feels true doesn't make it so.
- literalAardvark 2y agoConversely, a good deal of real human knowledge isn't in studies yet.
- jraph 2y agoIt's not knowledge then, it's beliefs (which might be true, but we don't know yet)
- literalAardvark 2y agoThat's entirely untrue. First off, the scientific method only finds things that are less wrong, there's never anything even close to certainty and finality. Your entire life's work could be entirely replaced by an Einstein. Secondly, there's an enormous volume of trade, industry and commercial knowledge that has exactly zero published studies but sufficient less-wrong "scientific" testing to be knowledge. And yet that's how things should be done, based on decades and centuries of craftsmanship, apprenticeships, and corporate knowledge. Your opinion is exactly why I posted what I posted. The scientific method is powerful, but it's extremely slow to propagate.
- temp0826 2y agoI guess a primary source like myself doesn't count for much, but fwiw I have seen hundreds of people go through this. Those that have done a lot of therapy (and have little to no experience with psychedelics) often have a lot of tools they've accumulated over their journeys and tend to get a lot out of it.
- mathgeek 2y agoThis is precisely why peer reviewed studies are so valuable and sources so important. Folks can properly value anecdotes (which can be valuable, don’t get me wrong) against other sources of knowledge.