4 ms·

Better not use popular toolchains then: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/New_C_Parser https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/New_C_Parser https://clang.llvm.org/features.html https

by amluto 2y ago

Better not use popular toolchains then: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/New_C_Parser https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/New_C_Parser https://clang.llvm.org/features.html https://clang.llvm.org/features.html I think this is a quite popular approach for multiple reasons. That being said, tree sitter uses GLR.

fatih-erikli-cg 2y ago
There is no recursion involved in parsing. You keep a stack for the tree.
- bonzini 2y ago
  Recursive descent uses the processor stack as the parsing stack.
  - fatih-erikli-cg 2y ago
    Recursion is mostly involved in interpreter, and most of the time it is a bad practice. No recursion needed in parser.
    - bonzini 2y ago
      Dunning-Krueger effect at its best, I am done arguing.