4 ms·
Thanks for your great work! I’d love to hear your thoughts on a recent “brainstorm” a few of us had here on HN about spreadsheets. How does this resonate with y
by wslh 2y ago
Thanks for your great work! I’d love to hear your thoughts on a recent “brainstorm” a few of us had here on HN about spreadsheets. How does this resonate with you? [1][2]
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42027356 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42027356
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41970554 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41970554
- nhatcher 2y agoHi wsih, thanks! There is a lot to unpack on those threads but of the top of my head: 1. Clear separation between UX/backend Done by design in IronCalc. It is first a spreadsheet engine. 2. Multi language support, language connectivity, enhanced data types, ... You might very well be right, but out first step is to be as close to Excel as possible. We are ~ 1 year away from being formula compatible in a reasonable way. Once we are there we can do better in different directions. I think strict typing might be very beneficial for spreadsheets engines. Anything you can do to reduce errors and human mistakes. I strongly believe that having a competitive spreadsheet engine fully open source might be a good first step in extending and improving Excel. Let's see!
- enugu 2y agoHyperfiddle and Quadratic implement some of the items on your wishlist (richer data types, modern programming languages, working with arrays, better connectivity to data tools).
- nhatcher 2y agoThey are both amazing tools!