3 ms·
I'll certainly give it a try. Another tool I've been using (with varied degree of success) to enhance my git life is https://github.com/tummychow/git-absorb htt
by leonheld 2y ago
I'll certainly give it a try. Another tool I've been using (with varied degree of success) to enhance my git life is https://github.com/tummychow/git-absorb https://github.com/tummychow/git-absorb. If both of these worked flawlessly or maybe even officially incorporated in git, I'd be very happy.
- ksynwa 2y agoThis sounds like what jujutsu's workflow is like by default
- leonheld 2y agoI've heard of jujutsu, but I'm kinda over learning new tooling, specially experimental one. If it's not a drop-in replacement that makes my life better (like these easy "git plugins"), I'm basically not using.
- fallingsquirrel 2y agofwiw you can mix git and jj commands on the same repo and everything will work fine. If you want to stick with 99% git commands, and use jj only as a replacement for git-absorb, you can. For this particular use case, jj will handle merges/tags descended from the fixed commit gracefully, and I don't think git-absorb handles that.
- stouset 2y agoIt is a drop-in replacement for git and completely compatible. Your coworkers do not need to know you're using a different tool. And you can continue to use git commands directly if you want.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dochtman 2y agogit absorb is great, use it all the time.