5 ms·
> but also demonstrating more than a de minimis level of knowledge or technical skill HN comments are not the right place for personal attacks. :'( I'm being
by vel0city 2y ago
> but also demonstrating more than a de minimis level of knowledge or technical skill
HN comments are not the right place for personal attacks. :'(
I'm being attacked for my neanderthal inability to understand five digit numbers :( my primitive understanding of time can only really comprehend two digit year values. Today is the year 1924, right? I failed to write my calendar application to accommodate such high year values as your superior intellect is used to reasoning about. Here I thought ISO 8601 was over engineered, turns out it didn't go far enough. We're all just too simple-minded compared to other big-brain bretheren. May we all learn from our five digit betters.
I'm sorry I'm just not smart enough to be at your level :'(
- 082349872349872 2y ago000Well, 01924 000is 0about right, 000because 000Morse 0hadn't 000invented the 000pure 0serial 000telegraph 0yet in 0001824. 000Five 0vs 000four is 000a 0different* channel; 000we're 0using zero 000not 000any 0of 000its successors. 000make 0any 000sense? * https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/86617#page/385/mode/2up https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/86617#page/385/mode...