> Sure. But we know it empirically is. Our brains are expensive. But our brains have mitochondria. As do our prey, and our predators. Is there any reason to su

> Sure. But we know it empirically is. Our brains are expensive. But our brains have mitochondria. As do our prey, and our predators. Is there any reason to suppose that the absence of mitochondria implies less potential for intelligence, instead of the potential for equal but slower intelligence? Mitochondria are about power production, not energy production -- they are a very dense source of ATP, but the reactions they use would provide equal energy even if less concentrated.