I figured the Security Council wasn't created for cooperation, but as a place where diplomacy/verbal arguments can be had, rather than (nuclear) violence. Ther

I figured the Security Council wasn't created for cooperation, but as a place where diplomacy/verbal arguments can be had, rather than (nuclear) violence. There was an opinion piece a few years ago that said, "soon the 5 permanent members of the SC could be lead by Xi, Putin, Trump, Johnson and Le Pen". At least Johnson can be ruled out. (Famous last words?)