> for some reason, Indians were never officially called "slaves" by the British The same goes for chinese, japanese and filipino "slaves". In official capacity

> for some reason, Indians were never officially called "slaves" by the British The same goes for chinese, japanese and filipino "slaves". In official capacity, they may not have been called slaves, but unofficially, they were. There are old portguese books that claimed japanese made the best slaves. And there was a british viceroy who claimed indians made the best slaves. > Guyanese are often considered "Hispanic" in the U.S. Maybe in official documents but certainly not in everyday life. Guyanese are considered and treated like indians or 'hindus' and they themselves view themselves as indians, not hispanic.