4 ms·
This process, known as primary endosymbiosis, happened at least twice, for mitochondria and chloroplasts. Further, while all chloroplasts (and more widely plast
by jjk166 2y ago
This process, known as primary endosymbiosis, happened at least twice, for mitochondria and chloroplasts. Further, while all chloroplasts (and more widely plastids) appear to share a common ancestor, there is evidence that mitochondria may descend from multiple lineages that underwent lateral gene transfer and/or convergent evolution. Nitroplasts are a likely another, separate instance of primary endosymbiosis.
There is also secondary endosymbiosis, where the endosymbiont organelles of one eukaryote are engulfed and incorporated into another eukaryotic cell to create a new type of endosymbiont. This has happened at least 8 times.
There are also theories that some other organelles are the product of other endosymbiosis events, many of which also have some of the hallmarks like their own genetic material. These theories are more speculative though.
It's also worth noting that while eukaryotes obviously gained some important capabilities from incorporating these endosymbionts, the endosymbionts they incorporated obviously managed to just evolve to perform those functions directly. Further, while one of eukaryotes' distinguishing features are mitochondria, there are several other major differences, and mitochondria are not believed to be what made eukaryotes better able to evolve complex multicellularity. Prokaryotes have indeed evolved multicellularity dozens of times, and we arbitrarily set our definition of complex multicellularity to distinguish from what prokaryotes have achieved.
- __MatrixMan__ 2y agoSee also: nitroplasts
- Symmetry 2y agoThe first time it happened involved a huge number of changes in the host cell, like the creation of a nucleus. That makes it seem more likely that an already eukaryotic cell can more easily incorporate other endosymbiotes. Observation of prokaryote/prokaryote endosymbiosis would be real evidence against the rise of eukaryotes being the or one of the main limitations in the number of intelligent species in our galaxy.
- jjk166 2y agoThere's really only one change that mattered - phagocytosis. The ancestor of all was a prokaryote that practiced phagocytosis, the process of engulfing other cells. Endosymbiosis resulted from some of these engulfed cells not being digested. There are no known modern prokaryotes capable of phagocytosis. Presumably the extinct prokaryotes who were capable, including those from the same lineage as the eukaryotes but which did not pick up mitochondria, were outcompeted by the eukaryotes who occupied the same niche. Other changes like the origin of the cell nucleus and many other organelles can be readily explained by other malfunctionings of the phagocytosis process. Basically once you have the ability to pinch off parts of your cell wall into internal structures, you suddenly get a bunch of internal structures made of stuff that look surprisingly like cell wall.
- hinkley 2y agoI believe there was an article here suggesting rather enthusiastically that nitroplasts are endosymbiots. Sometime in the Spring I believe.