> But the judge found a lack of specifics about what Zuckerberg did wrong, and said “control of corporate activity alone is insufficient” to establish liability

> But the judge found a lack of specifics about what Zuckerberg did wrong, and said “control of corporate activity alone is insufficient” to establish liability. Her decision does not affect related claims against Meta itself. It is unclear to me how your position is different, it would seem that any fair law would have the same aspects where you would have to prove specifics. So without specifics hold the company liable, with hold the individuals.