3 ms·

Huh? A ‘side’ doesn’t imply an ‘economic class’? Many millions of people can genuinely believe in something, be on a ‘side’, while being spread across the enti

Huh? A ‘side’ doesn’t imply an ‘economic class’? Many millions of people can genuinely believe in something, be on a ‘side’, while being spread across the entire economic spectrum. At best it can be said to be an ideological differentiation, not an economic differentiation.

Retric 2y ago
> A ‘side’ doesn’t imply an ‘economic class’? It does when the side described was the edges of a distribution. > wealth distribution, on the one side we have the super and hyper-rich Replace a few words and: > height distribution, on the one side we have the tall and hyper-tall PS: To be clear the political interests of a group exist even if the group doesn’t map to a specified political party or ideology. Groups have specific interests independent of which other stances they take. We don’t think of short people in political terms, but there would be a real outrage if gas stations put their credit card readers 7 feet off the ground.
- MichaelZuo 2y ago
  HN users can write anything they want, but that doesn’t automatically imply what they wrote is credible or must be assumed to be true for all subsequent replies… Hence why I wrote ‘side’ in quotation marks, because I didn’t fully agree with the original parent comment’s characterization. e.g. HN user 1 can say X part of the population is on the ‘side’ of the moon being made of blue cheese and Y part is on the ‘side’ of the moon being made of cheddar cheese. But future replies by HN user 2 and user 3 are free to treat that as all meaningless gibberish.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  - Retric 2y ago
    If you disagree with what someone posted then add a counter argument don’t just pretend it didn’t exist. It avoids this kind of pointless replies.
    - MichaelZuo 2y ago
      I read this comment a few minutes after it was posted and checked just now and you completely changed this comment to something else… I’m not going to engage with someone who does that without even putting an Edit: tag. So yes please do not reply…
      - Retric 2y ago
        At first I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, but upon reflection I deleted that comment as pointless. Your behavior is simply unworthy of attempting an intellectual discussion.
        MichaelZuo 2y ago
        Alright then leave, I’m not going to substantially engage with someone trying to deceive readers. Edit: Consider yourself lucky I’m not requesting a mod to ban this account ‘Retric’ for deception.
        Retric 2y ago
        That’s not how things operate here. Note how your complaint isn’t in the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html The site encourages people to delete unproductive comments that haven’t been responding to as it improves the reading experiences for 3rd parties. Which is one of the reasons there’s a big old delete button and you can edit posts for a full hour. Adding “Edit:” is important for clarity when a post has been responded to, without that it’s just clutter.
        MichaelZuo 2y ago
        I’m not going to substantially engage with you. Period.
        Retric 2y ago

Retric 2y ago

> A ‘side’ doesn’t imply an ‘economic class’? It does when the side described was the edges of a distribution. > wealth distribution, on the one side we have the super and hyper-rich Replace a few words and: > height distribution, on the one side we have the tall and hyper-tall PS: To be clear the political interests of a group exist even if the group doesn’t map to a specified political party or ideology. Groups have specific interests independent of which other stances they take. We don’t think of short people in political terms, but there would be a real outrage if gas stations put their credit card readers 7 feet off the ground.

MichaelZuo 2y ago
HN users can write anything they want, but that doesn’t automatically imply what they wrote is credible or must be assumed to be true for all subsequent replies… Hence why I wrote ‘side’ in quotation marks, because I didn’t fully agree with the original parent comment’s characterization. e.g. HN user 1 can say X part of the population is on the ‘side’ of the moon being made of blue cheese and Y part is on the ‘side’ of the moon being made of cheddar cheese. But future replies by HN user 2 and user 3 are free to treat that as all meaningless gibberish.
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
- Retric 2y ago
  If you disagree with what someone posted then add a counter argument don’t just pretend it didn’t exist. It avoids this kind of pointless replies.
  - MichaelZuo 2y ago
    I read this comment a few minutes after it was posted and checked just now and you completely changed this comment to something else… I’m not going to engage with someone who does that without even putting an Edit: tag. So yes please do not reply…
    - Retric 2y ago
      At first I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, but upon reflection I deleted that comment as pointless. Your behavior is simply unworthy of attempting an intellectual discussion.
      - MichaelZuo 2y ago
        Alright then leave, I’m not going to substantially engage with someone trying to deceive readers. Edit: Consider yourself lucky I’m not requesting a mod to ban this account ‘Retric’ for deception.
        Retric 2y ago
        That’s not how things operate here. Note how your complaint isn’t in the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html The site encourages people to delete unproductive comments that haven’t been responding to as it improves the reading experiences for 3rd parties. Which is one of the reasons there’s a big old delete button and you can edit posts for a full hour. Adding “Edit:” is important for clarity when a post has been responded to, without that it’s just clutter.
        MichaelZuo 2y ago
        I’m not going to substantially engage with you. Period.
        Retric 2y ago