4 ms·
In Q3 2024 Google spent $7.2B on "Sales & Marketing Expenses". The data is not broken down more granularly. If 50% of that is pure "Marketing Expense" then you'
by eejjjj82 2y ago
In Q3 2024 Google spent $7.2B on "Sales & Marketing Expenses". The data is not broken down more granularly. If 50% of that is pure "Marketing Expense" then you'll see that the scale of the market these players are competing for is worth $3.5B PER QUARTER in operating expenses to attract customers.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1652044/000165204424000118/goog-20240930.htm https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1652044/000165204424...
If you add a $15M one time capital expense to this then it doesn't even appear as a rounding error on this cash flow statement.
Acquiring a long term asset acting as a pillar of your marketing strategy then it begins to look like a very good deal.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- tester756 2y agoSure, you can have very sound theory to justify that But how do we measure it? How can we tell that it was successful / good idea or not? Even things like what is the difference between "chat.com" and "chat.ai"? Would "chat.ai" for 1M be more efficient than "chat.com" for 15M?