> Or has this changed somewhere in the last 4 years since I looked at it? See perhaps: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Safe_Harbor_Privacy_Princ

> Or has this changed somewhere in the last 4 years since I looked at it? See perhaps: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Safe_Harbor_Privacy_Principles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Safe_Harbor_Priv... (expired) * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Privacy_Shield https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Privacy_Shield (expired(?)) > The EU parliament raised substantial doubts that the new agreement reached by Ursula von der Leyen is actually conform with EU laws, as it still does not sufficiently protect EU citizens from US mass surveillance and severely fails to enforce basic human digital rights in the EU.[7] In May 2023 a resolution on this matter passed the EU parliament with 306 votes in favor and only 27 against, but so far has stayed without consequences.[8] The NGO NOYB (European Center for Digital Rights) has announced that it will once again try to set the Framework out of force in front of the European Court of Justice.[9] * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Data_Privacy_Framework https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Data_Privacy_Framework (in place)