4 ms·
AFAICT it doesn’t matter where things are hosted, the US still reserves the right to access the data because if the company or the parent company are based in o
by spockz 2y ago
AFAICT it doesn’t matter where things are hosted, the US still reserves the right to access the data because if the company or the parent company are based in or want to deal with the US.
Or has this changed somewhere in the last 4 years since I looked at it?
- deng 2y agoThat might very well be, but what are you gonna do? Forbid using Microsoft cloud services completely? As we say in Germany: that train has already left the station...
- sam_lowry_ 2y agoWith Trump in power, the train is running in reverse at full speed )
- ghusto 2y agoYes? It’s more a viable possibility than it’s ever been.
- throw0101d 2y ago> Or has this changed somewhere in the last 4 years since I looked at it? See perhaps: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Safe_Harbor_Privacy_Principles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Safe_Harbor_Priv... (expired) * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Privacy_Shield https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Privacy_Shield (expired(?)) > The EU parliament raised substantial doubts that the new agreement reached by Ursula von der Leyen is actually conform with EU laws, as it still does not sufficiently protect EU citizens from US mass surveillance and severely fails to enforce basic human digital rights in the EU.[7] In May 2023 a resolution on this matter passed the EU parliament with 306 votes in favor and only 27 against, but so far has stayed without consequences.[8] The NGO NOYB (European Center for Digital Rights) has announced that it will once again try to set the Framework out of force in front of the European Court of Justice.[9] * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Data_Privacy_Framework https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU–US_Data_Privacy_Framework (in place)