3 ms·
Thank you, I indeed meant _Dodge v Ford_. At the time it was decided it really did equate benefit with profit, but as you said there have been a bunch of subseq
by eschaton 2y ago
Thank you, I indeed meant _Dodge v Ford_. At the time it was decided it really did equate benefit with profit, but as you said there have been a bunch of subsequent decisions specifically declaring that they’re not the same thing. And as I said, the decision itself was non-precedential.