4 ms·
It seems a lot easier to blame the losing candidate for running an unattractive campaign than it does to assume the new york times itself has this much influenc
by PittleyDunkin 2y ago
It seems a lot easier to blame the losing candidate for running an unattractive campaign than it does to assume the new york times itself has this much influence. Surely most of their readers voted for Harris.
- _DeadFred_ 2y agoI don't see where the previous comment was blaming anyone for anything, just pointing out the NYTs recent behavior. Can you point me to the blame part?
- PittleyDunkin 2y ago> But what really gets me is the NYT. Man, they bent over backwards to normalize & sane-wash the craziest shit. Michael Tae Sweeney just turned it into his hole bit, but boy was he ever right: "the media covers Trump like this because they want him to win." Idk what blame means to you but this looks an awful lot like blame to me