3 ms·
> All static items served from s3/cloudfront. Posted images pushed to s3/cloudfront. (Or wherever filehosting is cheapest). Congratulations, you just massively
by charliesome 14y ago
> All static items served from s3/cloudfront. Posted images pushed to s3/cloudfront. (Or wherever filehosting is cheapest).
Congratulations, you just massively blew out your bandwidth bill. The cheapest option is to host your static content yourself, especially if you're serving over a petabyte of it per month.
- soup10 14y agoIt really doesn't matter where you host the static/image files, as long as it's completely separate from the application server and doesn't eat into it's resources.
- kalleboo 14y ago> We've also seen our image server's RAID array go from being relatively idle to getting absolutely slammed Sounds like it is?