> You're comparing SLS to a fantasy rocket. Incorrect. I also compared SLS to both (a) Falcon 9 and (b) Falcon Heavy. Both of which dramatically outperform it

> You're comparing SLS to a fantasy rocket. Incorrect. I also compared SLS to both (a) Falcon 9 and (b) Falcon Heavy. Both of which dramatically outperform it in regular commercial flight. Whereas SLS has had exactly one test flight. And of course Starship exists. It has flown 5 times, which is 4 times more than SLS. And has landed both parts at least once, which is infinitely many times more than SLS ever will. So which of these is the "fantasy rocket"?