4 ms·
> refuse to allow AI to insult (or offend) any person but would be okay if AI took part of killing them Liability and regulatory scrutiny are factors. They’re
by nyokodo 2y ago
> refuse to allow AI to insult (or offend) any person but would be okay if AI took part of killing them
Liability and regulatory scrutiny are factors. They’re liable about offensive speech but military use cases are an effective shield against liability given that deaths are expected.
- 123yawaworht456 2y ago>They’re liable about offensive speech there's nothing preventing them from implementing a toggleable filter, with a big red warning, geo-restrictions and even age verification if you want to turn it off. it's not legal liability that prevents them from doing that, it's ideology.
- nyokodo 2y ago> there's nothing preventing them from implementing a toggleable filter Which would not placate regulators in all likelihood. Close regulatory scrutiny is a big problem for companies seeking to grow, and a pesky cost for big companies.
- 123yawaworht456 2y agothat would make sense if Anthropic didn't spend the past two years hyping up retarded parrots as literally scifi skynet bullshit, begging the nanny state to step in and regoolate the shit out of retarded parrots industry before the unthinkable happens and a retarded parrot escapes the confinement to destroy the democracy