3 ms·
They're undercutting CF Workers - requests are $0.2/million rather than $0.3/million, and CPU time costs the same. Seems pretty good on paper. There's no free
by jsheard 2y ago
They're undercutting CF Workers - requests are $0.2/million rather than $0.3/million, and CPU time costs the same.
Seems pretty good on paper. There's no free allowance like you get with Workers though.
- j45 2y agoIf cost is a factor, one could plausibly put bunny behind cloudflare’s free side. Another positive side effect would be to have paid dual redundancy then too. Backblaze is another neighbour that plays nice with bunny.
- Sytten 2y agoTheir bandwidth is still too expensive and that is what really matters for an edge worker. It is not AWS expensive, but still 0.01$/GB is not cheap.
- csomar 2y agoYou usually use them for compute and low-bandwidth related activities (like an API).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- jorams 2y agoThey're close to as cheap as they come for CDN bandwidth list prices without minimums, especially for CDNs with their level of global coverage. Competitors in this space in particular are often much more expensive, like Deno Deploy's $0.50/GB. Cloudflare is effectively impossible to compare because it's all "free until you get an email from sales".
- pier25 2y agoI don't think egress really matters for this use case. How many API calls or HTML pages do you need to transfer 1GB?