4 ms·
No, I mean, with twitter you have ids and you can map those to real people. You often won't have a name other than the id, and the id won't normally be in wikip
by bazzargh 14y ago
No, I mean, with twitter you have ids and you can map those to real people. You often won't have a name other than the id, and the id won't normally be in wikipedia. For example, '@antanddec' is the twitter account for two UK tv presenters, but the account doesn't have their full names spelled out. It is verified though, which is usually a clue that they're someone (relatively) famous.
Also, unlike wikipedia, it is unambiguous - you can easily check that it is the celeb and not someone else with the same name (eg @warrenellis, who isn't the musician)
- pavel_lishin 14y ago> You often won't have a name other than the id, and the id won't normally be in wikipedia I wonder how long before this stops being the case. (e.g., http://i.imgur.com/Eiq5h.png http://i.imgur.com/Eiq5h.png)