4 ms·
The real difference between XMPP and Matrix is that I can read the discussions about XMPP on this site without the CEO of the company that pretends not to own i
by dingnuts 2y ago
The real difference between XMPP and Matrix is that I can read the discussions about XMPP on this site without the CEO of the company that pretends not to own it, but does de facto own it through some kind of wannabe Sam Altman "it's actually a non profit that happens to be controlled by my for profit company" move, coming into the comments to denigrate anyone with an ounce of criticism for his product
- SamWhited 2y ago(oh yah, FWIW he's done this to me too; shows up and accuses me of being biased against matrix and not disclosing my affiliation with XMPP stuff… meanwhile he controls a company and gets paid by them, I just chose to work on XMPP open source stuff instead of Matrix stuff and don't get paid for it)
- tcfhgj 2y agoNot being paid doesn't mean less biased. To the contrary: I expect a high bias since you choose to spend lots of time on it despite not being paid for it
- SamWhited 2y agoOr I did my research and made an informed decision which to work on. I didn't start working on one then only decide to dislike the other based on sunk cost fallacy. Matrix already existed when I got into doing XMPP stuff, and I looked into both.
- tcfhgj 2y agoIt's not about back then, but about when you write comments
- SamWhited 2y agoSo any negative comment is somehow bias and I should be doing Matrix instead? I don't get what you're getting at. I am still aware of both protocols, I still don't like Matrix and think XMPP is "good enough", or at least the best choice. Having an opinion doesn't make me biased against one or the other.
- tcfhgj 2y ago> I don't get what you're getting at. Not being paid for the work on something doesn't imply no bias towards it. > Having an opinion doesn't make me biased against one or the other. It might: Confirmation bias