5 ms·
Do I understand correctly that nolibc is just another implementation of the C standard library in terms of Linux syscalls? Comparably to, say, musl libc?
by n_plus_1_acc 2y ago
Do I understand correctly that nolibc is just another implementation of the C standard library in terms of Linux syscalls? Comparably to, say, musl libc?
- sph 2y agoglibc is a space shuttle, musl is a hatchback, nolibc is a skateboard They all do the same thing (take you from A to B), but offer different levels of comfort, efficiency and utility :)
- jonhohle 2y agoWho can take their space shuttle to work these days, what with the price of rocket fuel‽
- wbl 2y agoAnd passenger safety?
- fallingsquirrel 2y agoIn a head-on collision, the space shuttle passengers will fare better than the hatchback. Even so, it wouldn't be my first choice for most destinations.
- oguz-ismail 2y agoNo it's not comparable to musl libc. Standard I/O functions don't support buffering and the printf implementation can't print floats, for example.