5 ms·
Nice idea. I guess you could still do something similar by looking for verified accounts tweeting with your campaign hashtag(s). Or accounts that are otherwise
by bazzargh 14y ago
Nice idea. I guess you could still do something similar by looking for verified accounts tweeting with your campaign hashtag(s). Or accounts that are otherwise 'known' to be a celeb - there must be a directory out there.
- rmc 14y ago'known' to be a celeb - there must be a directory out there This is essentially what they did. Use Wikipedia as that directory. If you have the real name, you can check it.
- rpicard 14y agoThis doesn't seem to account for the fact that multiple people can have the same name. I don't play hockey, nor am I Canadian: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Picard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Picard
- RyanMcGreal 14y agoThat's presumably why the author had the list sent to him: to manually verify the potential VIP signatories before promoting them in the media.
- rpicard 14y agoThat's probably a good opportunity to make sure that they're comfortable with being used to promote the petition too. The script / using big names to promote the cause is a pretty smart idea.
- bazzargh 14y agoNo, I mean, with twitter you have ids and you can map those to real people. You often won't have a name other than the id, and the id won't normally be in wikipedia. For example, '@antanddec' is the twitter account for two UK tv presenters, but the account doesn't have their full names spelled out. It is verified though, which is usually a clue that they're someone (relatively) famous. Also, unlike wikipedia, it is unambiguous - you can easily check that it is the celeb and not someone else with the same name (eg @warrenellis, who isn't the musician)
- pavel_lishin 14y ago> You often won't have a name other than the id, and the id won't normally be in wikipedia I wonder how long before this stops being the case. (e.g., http://i.imgur.com/Eiq5h.png http://i.imgur.com/Eiq5h.png)