7 ms·
>designs the censorship of that platform to intentionally hurt nation state B by causing division amongst the citizens of nation state B If the division is a r
by logicchains 2y ago
>designs the censorship of that platform to intentionally hurt nation state B by causing division amongst the citizens of nation state B
If the division is a result of the platform exposing people in that nation to information that they previously didn't have access to, due to the government censoring it, then it's absolutely a good thing for the people of the nation. The government of the nation state can get fucked when its interests go against the interests of its people. A divided people is a much better thing than a people united by ignorance and belief in falsehood.
- lazystar 2y agobut thats not what nation state A is doing - differing amounts of information is selectively made available to different groups of citizens in nation state B, purely to sow discord when those two groups of citizens interact.
- aprilthird2021 2y agoBut it doesn't matter what the intent is. The intent behind many types of publishing and media can be malicious. The ability to publish that media and the ability of Americans to consume that media is protected free speech