3 ms·

I don't agree with all your points, but I very much respect that you criticize Trump's policies. That is so much more reasonable and productive than using hoaxe

I don't agree with all your points, but I very much respect that you criticize Trump's policies. That is so much more reasonable and productive than using hoaxes after hoaxes like the media and Harris' campaign team did. Speaking of abortion rights, I believe few people will even talk about it in the next election cycle, as it has become a state issue. I also find it interesting that many pro-lifers hate Trump for overturning Roe vs Wade because they won't get millions and millions of dollars every year for the sake of fighting abortion rights.

paxys 2y ago
What's not to agree with? He literally did all of that.
- hintymad 2y ago
  I meant that I actually thought some of his policies were right. Not that I'm correct, of course, but as a voter I like some of his doing.
  - le-mark 2y ago
    What hoaxes are you referring to? Her criticisms were mostly factual from what I saw.
    - hintymad 2y ago
      For starters: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/. Harris repeatedly used it, so did Obama.
      - Sabinus 2y ago
        What about trying to steal the last election and deliberately interrupting the peaceful transfer of power? First President to not attend the inauguration of his successor for 150 years.
        hintymad 2y ago
        I despise Trump for that too
  - johnnyanmac 2y ago
    >I actually thought some of his policies were right. which ones?
    - hintymad 2y ago
      I like that now it is states that decide the abortion rules. I think that's as democratic as it gets. Besides, even Ginsburg was against the Roe vs Wade ruling. She said using privacy as the reason makes the ruling vulnerable, and she turns out to e right. Another one is that ee pulled out of the Iran Nuclear deal. Iran was contained and didn't have money to fund Houthis.
      - johnnyanmac 2y ago
        >I think that's as democratic as it gets. I don't. Let's be realistic: everytime we go "states rights" it's almost always so the state can control some sector of the population. We reworked the articles of confederation for a reason. We're one country. Not 50. Land of the free right? Something as base as bodily operations should be a personal choice, just like any other religious belief out there. Not determined by the mood of your mayor. If you want a purely logistical reason instead of moral: banning abortion doesn't ban abortions. It just increases infantcide, something we all disagree with. If someone doesn't want a baby, they'll get rid of it. Same ideas as prohibition. And do we really want to punish a woman for an operation she did on her body? In another state or in the backstreets? >Besides, even Ginsburg was against the Roe vs Wade ruling. S Yes, for reasons in that the Supreme Court doesn't enact laws. She instead wanted congress to make it a federal protection. But look how thars going. Almost like she knew a shift in the courts can remove it easier than a passed law... >Another one is that ee pulled out of the Iran Nuclear deal. I Guess it's nice we made up for Regean decades later. I'll give him that
      - 6E696365 2y ago
        > I like that now it is states that decide the abortion rules. I think that's as democratic as it gets. Why do you prefer this over letting individuals decide for themselves? If the goal of democracy is to give power to the people, would this not be the most democratic option?
TomK32 2y ago
pro-lifers will have enough to fight, just last week a teenage mother to be died after she was didn't get the medical attention she needed https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/01/nevaeh-crain-death-texas-abortion-ban-emtala/ https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/01/nevaeh-crain-death-t... They just have to re-align their mindset a little bit.
- fakedang 2y ago
  Absolutely bonkers to me that fanatical ultra-religious Islamic countries have legalized abortion for situations where "the mother's life may be in danger from prolonging the pregnancy", while Texas goes medieval with that kind of shit. F** AG Paxton.

paxys 2y ago

What's not to agree with? He literally did all of that.

hintymad 2y ago
I meant that I actually thought some of his policies were right. Not that I'm correct, of course, but as a voter I like some of his doing.
- le-mark 2y ago
  What hoaxes are you referring to? Her criticisms were mostly factual from what I saw.
  - hintymad 2y ago
    For starters: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/. Harris repeatedly used it, so did Obama.
    - Sabinus 2y ago
      What about trying to steal the last election and deliberately interrupting the peaceful transfer of power? First President to not attend the inauguration of his successor for 150 years.
      - hintymad 2y ago
        I despise Trump for that too
- johnnyanmac 2y ago
  >I actually thought some of his policies were right. which ones?
  - hintymad 2y ago
    I like that now it is states that decide the abortion rules. I think that's as democratic as it gets. Besides, even Ginsburg was against the Roe vs Wade ruling. She said using privacy as the reason makes the ruling vulnerable, and she turns out to e right. Another one is that ee pulled out of the Iran Nuclear deal. Iran was contained and didn't have money to fund Houthis.
    - johnnyanmac 2y ago
      >I think that's as democratic as it gets. I don't. Let's be realistic: everytime we go "states rights" it's almost always so the state can control some sector of the population. We reworked the articles of confederation for a reason. We're one country. Not 50. Land of the free right? Something as base as bodily operations should be a personal choice, just like any other religious belief out there. Not determined by the mood of your mayor. If you want a purely logistical reason instead of moral: banning abortion doesn't ban abortions. It just increases infantcide, something we all disagree with. If someone doesn't want a baby, they'll get rid of it. Same ideas as prohibition. And do we really want to punish a woman for an operation she did on her body? In another state or in the backstreets? >Besides, even Ginsburg was against the Roe vs Wade ruling. S Yes, for reasons in that the Supreme Court doesn't enact laws. She instead wanted congress to make it a federal protection. But look how thars going. Almost like she knew a shift in the courts can remove it easier than a passed law... >Another one is that ee pulled out of the Iran Nuclear deal. I Guess it's nice we made up for Regean decades later. I'll give him that
    - 6E696365 2y ago
      > I like that now it is states that decide the abortion rules. I think that's as democratic as it gets. Why do you prefer this over letting individuals decide for themselves? If the goal of democracy is to give power to the people, would this not be the most democratic option?

TomK32 2y ago

pro-lifers will have enough to fight, just last week a teenage mother to be died after she was didn't get the medical attention she needed https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/01/nevaeh-crain-death-texas-abortion-ban-emtala/ https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/01/nevaeh-crain-death-t... They just have to re-align their mindset a little bit.

fakedang 2y ago
Absolutely bonkers to me that fanatical ultra-religious Islamic countries have legalized abortion for situations where "the mother's life may be in danger from prolonging the pregnancy", while Texas goes medieval with that kind of shit. F** AG Paxton.