3 ms·

It was monumentally stupid to convict Trump for a "crime" that was basically someone else filling his taxes wrong. Something most USA people would feel is unfai

It was monumentally stupid to convict Trump for a "crime" that was basically someone else filling his taxes wrong. Something most USA people would feel is unfair and could happen to them. Also I am not from USA and very happy I don't have to deal with TurboTax lobbying and shenanigans thar make the USA tax code to be just crazy. Also the "bank fraud" trial is also monumentally stupid when they wanted to convict him and close his companies (thus making people lose their jobs) for doing something that resulted in profits for the supposed victim. Victim in fact that explained multiple times they were pleased with the business and would do it again. The message in the second case was: we will take your jobs because your boss made a good deal, don't vote for him! And of course this is just idiotic.

throwaway25664 2y ago
You have some misunderstandings on these cases —- How to understand next week’s Trump criminal felony trial https://robertreich.substack.com/p/dont-call-it-the-hush-money-case https://robertreich.substack.com/p/dont-call-it-the-hush-mon... How Trump is liable for fraud even though no one was hurt https://robertreich.substack.com/p/how-trump-is-liable-for-fraud-even https://robertreich.substack.com/p/how-trump-is-liable-for-f...
- Redoubts 2y ago
  For anyone seeing this, these links are a waste of time. They don’t demonstrate a misunderstanding or provide a better one. > Many people I speak with are worried that this is the weakest of Trump’s four pending criminal trials because it has to do with an illicit affair. > Wrong. No this was the weakest case. The fact that this is the one to get across the finish line, rather than say the Georgia interference case, demonstrates raw political incompetence by the democrats.
  - throwaway25664 2y ago
    Not a waste of time — 1. ‘for a "crime" that was basically someone else filling his taxes wrong.’ — utterly false 2. Getting lucky is no excuse for fraud. See aforementioned posts for actual, well-reasoned arguments from world-renowned UC Berkeley professor and former Cabinet Secretary Robert Reich, which Redoubts hasn’t refuted. The case that resulted in Trump being convicted of 34 federal felony counts wasn’t the weakest case; that’s demonstrated by the jury, selected by both sides, having deliberated over the available evidence and both sides’ arguments, and having reached a unanimous verdict. The Georgia case had been going much more slowly because it’s a much more complex case, for obvious reasons. Its current stalled status has to do with the conflict of interest that Willis created. If the case somehow resumes, the jury, selected by both sides, will decide the case. The speed and outcomes of these cases are not “political competence or incompetence” matters on the part of Democrats.

throwaway25664 2y ago

You have some misunderstandings on these cases —- How to understand next week’s Trump criminal felony trial https://robertreich.substack.com/p/dont-call-it-the-hush-money-case https://robertreich.substack.com/p/dont-call-it-the-hush-mon... How Trump is liable for fraud even though no one was hurt https://robertreich.substack.com/p/how-trump-is-liable-for-fraud-even https://robertreich.substack.com/p/how-trump-is-liable-for-f...

Redoubts 2y ago
For anyone seeing this, these links are a waste of time. They don’t demonstrate a misunderstanding or provide a better one. > Many people I speak with are worried that this is the weakest of Trump’s four pending criminal trials because it has to do with an illicit affair. > Wrong. No this was the weakest case. The fact that this is the one to get across the finish line, rather than say the Georgia interference case, demonstrates raw political incompetence by the democrats.
- throwaway25664 2y ago
  Not a waste of time — 1. ‘for a "crime" that was basically someone else filling his taxes wrong.’ — utterly false 2. Getting lucky is no excuse for fraud. See aforementioned posts for actual, well-reasoned arguments from world-renowned UC Berkeley professor and former Cabinet Secretary Robert Reich, which Redoubts hasn’t refuted. The case that resulted in Trump being convicted of 34 federal felony counts wasn’t the weakest case; that’s demonstrated by the jury, selected by both sides, having deliberated over the available evidence and both sides’ arguments, and having reached a unanimous verdict. The Georgia case had been going much more slowly because it’s a much more complex case, for obvious reasons. Its current stalled status has to do with the conflict of interest that Willis created. If the case somehow resumes, the jury, selected by both sides, will decide the case. The speed and outcomes of these cases are not “political competence or incompetence” matters on the part of Democrats.