7 ms·
> dropping the part of your brand name that actually makes it recognizable This feels a lot like Twitter -> X, I guess we have to get used to this.
by wseqyrku 2y ago
> dropping the part of your brand name that actually makes it recognizable
This feels a lot like Twitter -> X, I guess we have to get used to this.
- swyx 2y agoalso openai is moving to a post gpt world
- kmeisthax 2y agoTwitter -> X is such a terrible rebrand even Elon Musk doesn't use it consistently.
- dmonitor 2y agoI don't get why he didn't rebrand it as "twitter on X", X encompassing the chatbot, job search, group voice calls, etc and "twitter" being an "app" on X
- basch 2y agobecause then the press wound still refer to it as twitter. who calls alphabet alphabet? meta ended up slightly better only because they had three or four really strong consumer brands.
- sunaookami 2y ago>who calls alphabet alphabet? Not the same as Alphabet is the parent company and media do call it so when the parent company is fined for example. Same for Meta. Also, the press does write "X" or "X (formerly Twitter").
- mcperr3 2y agoI don't call alphabet anything because I don't talk about alphabet. Google is a subsidiary within alphabet.
- basch 2y agoI replied to a comment recommending Twitter be a subsidiary of X.
- sebazzz 2y agoHe jumps consistently in an X shape every time he makes a public speech though. He is pretty… important about the X.
- insane_dreamer 2y agoIt’s because X was supposed to become a one app to rule them all like WeChat in China, and that obviously never happened (maybe because he fired everyone?), instead X is just Elon’s personal Twitter.
- type0 2y agoIt's sad but it might eventually. I would imagine to the end of Trump cadence we'll be paying with x-coin in supermarkets, both he and Elon will be making tons of money. Trumps and Elons x-coin will have tariffs built in to it and you won't be paying taxes if you use it /s