4 ms·
For sufficiently new version of Python (3.2+), concurrent.futures[1] is pretty nice for its use-case, but otherwise multiprocessing has been quite good. [1]: h
by dbaupp 14y ago
For sufficiently new version of Python (3.2+), concurrent.futures[1] is pretty nice for its use-case, but otherwise multiprocessing has been quite good.
[1]: http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/concurrent.futures.html http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/concurrent.futures.html