3 ms·
Ahh, I didn’t explicitly say that he is more charismatic than Harris. I said, if the Democrats have chosen someone more charismatic than Harris, they would hav
by noncoml 2y ago
Ahh, I didn’t explicitly say that he is more charismatic than Harris.
I said, if the Democrats have chosen someone more charismatic than Harris, they would have won.
- pcthrowaway 2y agoYou said "Hillary and Harris have less charisma than my cat. They are simply unelectable" Well.. Trump was elected. If you're not saying Trump is more charismatic then this all seems to contradict your point that charisma is necessary for electibility.
- noncoml 2y agoJust arguing for logic's shake now. You are making a logical jump there. Hillary and Harris are Democrats. Trump is Republican. Based on logic, just because Trump won doesn't automatically make him more charismatic, as there are other factors that play role. So logically you cannot assert that this is true; Trump winning <==> Trump more charismatic
- shiroiushi 2y agoThe problem is that the rules are different. For Democrats, if they want to win, they need someone with charisma. See Biden, Obama, and Bill Clinton, versus Hillary Clinton and Dukakis for historical examples. Republicans don't need charisma: if the Democratic candidate isn't charismatic enough, they'll instead vote for whatever pile of shit the GOP puts on the ticket. The problem is the voters.