> Realistically it’s so ambiguous that any interpretation is plausible. The dude isn't some rushed working single mother. He had amble time to choose what he w

> Realistically it’s so ambiguous that any interpretation is plausible. The dude isn't some rushed working single mother. He had amble time to choose what he wanted to convey and instead chose that title. When your study creates 2 populations (those with good numeracy and those without) and you make a claim that one of those populations "do worse" than it's always implicitly with respect to the other population.