Yeah, it's like the only "existing" or "correct" use of a protocol is that which is explicitly plnned for bythe authors.. No, yeah, that's not useful. Speedtes

Yeah, it's like the only "existing" or "correct" use of a protocol is that which is explicitly plnned for bythe authors.. No, yeah, that's not useful. Speedtest similarly does not exist. Junior engineers holding it wrong will misinterpret the results. Yet it can provide actionable and valuable information. As for "it's too complicated to wrap your head around": It appears the OPs major issue is people around them not understanding that "absence of confirmation is not confirmation of absence". I don't think the issue is actually complexity.