3 ms·
Yes. So far the only thing on the internets I voluntire to pay is LWN - for quality of articles. HN is in worse position - it's "just" mass and quality commen
by Woodi 2y ago
Yes.
So far the only thing on the internets I voluntire to pay is LWN - for quality of articles.
HN is in worse position - it's "just" mass and quality comments which is easier to copy, eg. lobster alredy exist and there "was" slashdot before (but form is somewhat unreadable...).
But if I had a choice - ads or paywall - then paywall is superior for both sides, possibly even the future.
But HN should wait till WW3 ends...
- umairjutt 2y agoI got your point, but question is that what Can Hacker News do new & you will be willing to pay for that?