3 ms·
You know, a simpler explanation would be that people just think you're wrong and don't want to spend their time arguing with a random Internet user about a damn
by squigz 2y ago
You know, a simpler explanation would be that people just think you're wrong and don't want to spend their time arguing with a random Internet user about a damn horror meme.
- Jerrrrrrry 2y agoThat isn't simpler, nor logical. Simpler is that I am right and they are in denial. And if they didn't want to waste their time arguing, they could had at least used the time they did forfeit to make a single point. But go ahead, explain that, and continue to not address nor acknowledge the clear ideas I have articulated that only a single user has hinted at understanding. When you are correct, you don't need to explain yourself further, especially in the absence of any good-faith refutations. go ahead. I can source my claims, yall cant source your insecurities.
- squigz 2y agoNot a single one of your arguments has been clear, and you haven't linked a single source about anything.
- Jerrrrrrry 2y agoList my arguments. and I hadn't done something that I will do, because those are difference tenses. try harder.