That's not my experience unless LLM providers are caching results. It's frustratingly difficult to get it to output substantially different text for a given pro

That's not my experience unless LLM providers are caching results. It's frustratingly difficult to get it to output substantially different text for a given prompt. It's like internally it always follows mostly the same reasoning for step 1, then step 2 applies light fudging of the output to give the appearance of randomness, but the underlying structure is generally the same. That's why there's so much blog spam that all pretty much read the same, but while one "delves" into a topic another "dives" into it. How long until they can write genuinely unique output without piles of additional prompting?