4 ms·

So if there's no way to measure the advantage of in office vs remote is just entirely a vibes based decision? Sounds fairly reckless for a company of that scale

So if there's no way to measure the advantage of in office vs remote is just entirely a vibes based decision? Sounds fairly reckless for a company of that scale. Companies have social responsibilities for their employees, and financial responsibilities against their owners. Surely you can't just say "I feel it's better to disrupt the life of a large chunk of our employees because that's what I feel like"

JambalayaJimbo 2y ago
Sure it’s a vibes based decision. This is how companies are run and always be run. This is _why_ Amazon has a CEO and not a statistical model making decisions. Anyway your depiction of “disruption” is obviously biased- it’s also equivalent to say _not_ going back to the pre-Covid normal is disrupting the life of employees.
- JohnFen 2y ago
  > it’s also equivalent to say _not_ going back to the pre-Covid normal is disrupting the life of employees. But it actually is. The pre-covid normal was always pretty bad, and now people are more aware that it doesn't have to be that way.