In the journey of learning, it is certainly a good point when our understanding grows so great, that we can point to things that are unknown and claim with cert

In the journey of learning, it is certainly a good point when our understanding grows so great, that we can point to things that are unknown and claim with certainty that they are bullshit. It is no easy feat, as to denounce a concept as bullshit, we need to effectively prove a negative, which depends on knowing either all of the things adjacent to that subject, or most of them, and coming to the conclusion that it's not like the others. It's like learning that Astrology and Phrenology are not like Astronomy, or Psychology. My current suspect for non-real status is Software Architecture, as a subject of study I don't think it holds any merit. And to the extent that it denotes something real, it, they are already covered in other disciplines with clearer peripheries in classical academic curricula and folklore domains.