3 ms·
Agree, other than that I wouldn't use "2-arity". Maybe "2-ary", but that's just "binary" written confusingly. It works for "n-ary". I'd rather say that a binar
by reichstein 2y ago
Agree, other than that I wouldn't use "2-arity". Maybe "2-ary", but that's just "binary" written confusingly. It works for "n-ary".
I'd rather say that a binary operator _has_ an arity of 2 or talk about the arity _of_ an operator.