2 ms·
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Would you even have known the details for each of the 25k people? I could make a similar argument that when I worked f
by vlovich123 2y ago
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. Would you even have known the details for each of the 25k people? I could make a similar argument that when I worked for Apple back in the day I didn't know about anyone doing anything illegal. But Apple is a massive company and I'm sure there was probably all sorts of things going on.
- enriquec 2y agoWhen you make an assertion, you have to prove the positive. Proving the negative isn't how logic works.