2 ms·
Not necessarily, the implication is that if you don't give them money they may obtain money through nefarious means. Certainly, if you or I were pushed to homel
by consteval 2y ago
Not necessarily, the implication is that if you don't give them money they may obtain money through nefarious means. Certainly, if you or I were pushed to homelessness and addicted to hard drugs stealing wouldn't be off the table.
- fluoridation 2y ago>the implication is that if you don't give them money they may obtain money through nefarious means. It sounds like you're saying that the fault of thefts is on the people who don't give money to panhandling addicts. >Certainly, if you or I were pushed to homelessness and addicted to hard drugs stealing wouldn't be off the table. "If you were different to the way you are, you would do things you wouldn't otherwise do" is a rather inane thing to say, don't you think? You don't need to argue for the fact that people steal; that's obvious.