Agree on all counts. I'm sorry you had to go through an unfair accusation. I've been there and it sucks. > It simply explains a lot of his (odd) reasoning and

Agree on all counts. I'm sorry you had to go through an unfair accusation. I've been there and it sucks. > It simply explains a lot of his (odd) reasoning and behavior. It does not absolve him from his behavior, nor does it acquit him from time in prison for his criminal deeds. 100 times yes. That was what I was trying to convey, though mostly from the point-of-view that the police, public opinion and the podcaster have used his behaviour to amplify his guilt and the perception of him being a monster. I don't even see why anyone would need any more than the fact that he murdered his children's mother to condemn him. Everything else is irrelevant and not necessarily an indication that he was going to commit a crime, as the podcast suggests. I guess it wouldn't make for nearly as much a compelling and revolting story.