6 ms·
I guess that's what happens when you max out the bandwidth of your display connectors with bizarre resolutions. I'll take the 1440p144hz display, thank you very
by talldayo 2y ago
I guess that's what happens when you max out the bandwidth of your display connectors with bizarre resolutions. I'll take the 1440p144hz display, thank you very much.
- _ignore_space 2y agomacOS doesn't do subpixel anti-aliasing/fractional scaling. Your 1440p display would look awful (there are 3rd party tools that can help, but not completely fix this). "Retina" displays also require a certain PPI [0]. [0] https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/optimal-pixel-density-for-external-display.2323255/ https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/optimal-pixel-density-f...
- talldayo 2y agoI don't use MacOS anymore. I use GNOME/Wayland with fractional upscaling and it doesn't do any blurry nonsense like MacOS insists upon.
- _ignore_space 2y agoThen I'm unsure why you made your comment in the first place. The OP posted a monitor specifically designed for Mac OS and it's capabilities. There would be little reason to purchase this style of monitor for a non-Mac system with the variety of choices on the market.
- abraxas 2y agoTo each their own. I would gladly take a high DPI screen with low refresh rates over the opposite. For work I can't bear to have any monitor with less than 220DPI.