> No party was coerced, and they could have negotiated for different terms This is my pet peeve with certain forms of right-wing libertarianism. If it's possib

> No party was coerced, and they could have negotiated for different terms This is my pet peeve with certain forms of right-wing libertarianism. If it's possible to recreate all the market restrictions of a totalitarian government through private property, markets, and cunning; then what does that kind of libertarianism actually say? Tyranny is only bad if the tyrant hasn't signed the right paperwork?