OVH and Hetzner offer cheap unmetered VPS instances, Cloudflare CDN doesn't have any bandwidth restrictions... Yes 10GB of data is cheap. If they were serving o

OVH and Hetzner offer cheap unmetered VPS instances, Cloudflare CDN doesn't have any bandwidth restrictions... Yes 10GB of data is cheap. If they were serving off EC2, then after the first 100 GB of the month it's 9 cents/GB or 90 cents per 10GB, which is absurd, but still not terribly expensive in the grand scheme of things: what would be a surprise lesson-teaching bill, $90 after a TB / 10,000 visitors? I'm surprised some users think it's a lot on an individual scale. Consider an ideal persona for this submission: query some movies, then go stream several GBs for one. The 100 MB payload isn't much in comparison. I admit it is kind of bad form for mobile users who might be on metered data plans, and a warning and trigger for manual action for those devices would be kinder. One thing that might help reset your notion of what a lot of bandwidth is would be to browse around with your network tab in the developer console open for a day. nytimes home page is 14 MB and they get a ton of traffic. Even a corporate blog on the HN front page right now that could just be the tiny compressed text is 2 MB. Single image loads on many pages can be 1 MB or more. Glancing at the submission, the response headers indicate it seems they're serving from S3 Cloudfront, which is free for the first TB per month, though after that it gets back to absurd pricing. AWS is not price competitive.