3 ms·
It's not so much that storage sucked, as the interfaces for storage sucked. We didn't have much you could plug a better drive into. The floppy cable's protocol
by dale_glass 2y ago
It's not so much that storage sucked, as the interfaces for storage sucked.
We didn't have much you could plug a better drive into. The floppy cable's protocol was too restrictive to support anything much fancier, exposing too many internal details. And the parallel port was awfully slow. And SCSI was unfortunately absent from the consumer hardware.
That made it really hard for anyone to make a better storage device, because it'd find itself immediately constrained.
It's only in modern times where we finally have technology-agnostic interfaces that make it possible to use any storage tech you like, bandwidth to spare, and a generic USB storage driver meaning that even if you do own some oddball device you can still plug it into any random computer and have it work out of the box.
- immibis 2y agoISA/PCI bus? (And IDE, which is just the ISA bus over a differently shaped cable) In that era, addon cards were quite normal - not like today when the addon card slot is de-facto just a graphics card slot and motherboards are being designed around that assumption.
- raverbashing 2y agoNo, floppies are not IDE They're this weird interface that sends data byte by byte IIRC (or even worse) Not IDE, it has none of its smartness
- immibis 2y agoNo, IDE is not floppies. It's IDE.
- FullyFunctional 2y agoThe floppy drive in the Itanium I owned used the IDE interface. Go figure.