4 ms·
That could be because in many of the cases where the police have done something wrong, they destroyed/confiscated evidence of that wrongdoing.
by w1ntermute 14y ago
That could be because in many of the cases where the police have done something wrong, they destroyed/confiscated evidence of that wrongdoing.
- tptacek 14y agoI have no idea what you're trying to say. So... what... you think the police shouldn't endorse recording of police encounters? Because I was giving an example of the police doing that.
- w1ntermute 14y agoYou said that video usually supports the officers' statements, and not the civilians' statements, according to the official statistics. However, those statistics could actually be quite distorted, if the police regularly destroyed the video in those cases in which they were at fault. I'm basically just saying that the statistics could be misleading.
- einhverfr 14y agoI would think that if there was a general rule of police recording their stops, the lack of recording in a contested situation might be damning in itself.