4 ms·
That is false equivalence, there's a class of things that should rightfully be discouraged from military use (chemical/biological weapons, land mines, phosphoro
by Tier3r 2y ago
That is false equivalence, there's a class of things that should rightfully be discouraged from military use (chemical/biological weapons, land mines, phosphorous weapons) because of the significant harm/side effects they cause beyond some definition of acceptable.
- eli 2y agoAren't your examples all things that are solely of interest or use to the military?
- Jerrrrrrry 2y ago[flagged]
- jmward01 2y agoThanks for pointing that out. I think this clearly shows the difference between 'allowing use' and 'supporting a use case' when it comes to bio-tech. Vaccinating a soldier is allowing use, creating a biological weapon is supporting a use case. I wouldn't want to work for a bio weapons manufacturer but working for a vaccine maker would be just fine with me even if my efforts were used by the military.
- Jerrrrrrry 2y agoLol I love how you were sincere (seemingly) and I still got negged and flagged
- fragmede 2y agoRelatedly, when I ask Llama how to make red phosphorus it tells me off. What's the military going to do with an AI that refuses to help write plans on how to invade a country or kill an enemy. Then again, maybe its military masters are better at threatening it than I and can jailbreak it more easily.