> But doesn't explain any of it. This is not detailed. Just listing things you want is not detailed. In a two-party race like this, I'd argue she kinda doesn't

> But doesn't explain any of it. This is not detailed. Just listing things you want is not detailed. In a two-party race like this, I'd argue she kinda doesn't have to. People know Donald Trump as "the oil president", simply marketing yourself as the alternative is all she has to do when her opponent's reputation precedes himself. Normally I'd agree, and overall I resent how American policy promotion on both sides of the aisle has turned into virtue signalling. This is a good example of taking advantage in an adversaries blind-spot though - climate change is a real concern, and certain candidates can't even acknowledge that with a straight face.